Civil War Hospital Ship

The U.S.S. Red Rover, a captured Confederate vessel, was refitted as a hospital ship.

Evolution of Civil War Nursing

The evolution of the nursing profession in America was accelerated by the Civil War.

The Practice of Surgery

Amputations were the most common surgery performed during the Civil War.

Army Medical Museum and Library

Surgeon-General William Hammond established The Army Medical Museum in 1862. It was the first federal medical research facility.

Civil War Amputation Kit

Many Civil War surgical instruments had handles of bone, wood or ivory. They were never sterilized.

Thursday, February 2, 2017

Badass of the Week: Mary E. Walker

By Ben Thompson

"Tables about breast high had been erected upon which the screaming victims were having legs and arms cut off. The surgeons and their assistants, stripped to the waist and bespattered with blood, stood around, some holding the poor fellows while others, armed with long, bloody knives and saws, cut and sawed away with frightful rapidity, throwing the mangled limbs on a pile nearby as soon as removed." -- Lt. Col. W.W. Blackford, 1st Virginia Cavalry

Detonating artillery shells and the non-stop rattling of musketry menacingly rumbled in the distance, barely audible over the groans and agonizing cries of dying men as droves of new arrivals steadily flooded into the ordinary, single-family home that was now being utilized as a front-line field hospital.  Horse-drawn ambulance carts packed full of trauma victims lined the driveway to a grisly facility that mashed together a barely-serviceable emergency room, operating room, and morgue into a painfully-typical three-bedroom house on the outskirts of Chattanooga, Tennessee, the hospital's overworked, exhausted nurses desperately trying to triage the wounded between those who are possibly treatable and those who aren't going to make it.

Outside the city walls the Union Army, pushed back to Chattanooga following their crushing defeat at Chickamauga, was making a desperate stand to hold the city against a massive Confederate counter-attack.  46,000 men of Braxton Bragg's Army of Tennessee were entrenched on the heights overlooking the critical strategic rail and communications center, with the Union forces backed up against the Tennessee River, but now a massive assault led by General George Thomas was rushing straight up a steep ridge, straight into hardened enemy positions that included 112 cannons, and were taking murderous fire from the enemy in an all-out attempt to smash the Confederates' defensive positions and break out of the siege.  Those wounded soldiers lucky enough to find their way back to friendly lines found themselves here, in a stinking, unsterilized, makeshift hospital surrounded by malaria-infected men and saw-wielding surgeons practicing a particular brand of medicine that had more in common with medieval torture than anything resembling a modern-day visit to the pediatrician, their only consolation being a cup of cold water and the soothing voice of nurses trying to comfort them and ease their pain in some small way.

During the Civil War, over ten thousand women worked as nurses in field hospitals across the war zone.

Mary Edwards Walker of the 52nd Ohio Volunteer Infantry is the only one who served as a surgeon.  She's also the only woman in history to ever receive the Medal of Honor, the highest award for military bravery offered by the United States of America.

Walker was a woman who was roughly a hundred and fifty years ahead of her time.  Routinely criticized by women and men alike for her desire to wear men's clothing (at a time when "men's clothing" basically meant "any article of clothing that allowed you to walk through doorways or work in any capacity whatsoever), Walker paid her own way through Syracuse Medical College in 1855, becoming just the second woman in American history to complete physician training and work as a doctor.  When the Civil War broke out in 1861, Walker had already been running her own private practice for six years, but even though there were just 86 licenses surgeons in the Union Army at the start of the hostilities she was still turned away by every recruiting officer she approached.  Undeterred, the 29 year-old surgeon signed on as a volunteer  nurse, working on the front lines at the First Battle of Bull Run, then working as an unpaid volunteer surgeon at Indiana Hospital later that year.

Walker continued her practice of "I'll just show up wherever people are dying and see if they'll maybe let me help fix them for free", volunteering at the Battle of Fredericksburg in 1862, performing front-line operations, and taking control of a medical train that was ferrying wounded men back to Washington.  Her skills at slicing and dicing men up in the name of science so impressed Union General Ambrose Burnside that the Federal commander nominated her for a commission.  At first she met with the resistance she was so used to encountering, but thanks to Burnside's recommendation, she was finally commissioned as an Assistant Surgeon in the 52nd Ohio Volunteer Infantry, issued a U.S. Army surgeon's uniform, and sent to Tennessee to help treat wounded and dying men during the siege of Chattanooga.  She would be the only woman in the war to receive this honor.

Now, in order to fully appreciate how intense the job of a Civil War surgeon actually was, try to think of it as something of a cross between the Spanish Inquisition and an Eastern European butcher shop.  Since artillery shells, canister fire, and cannonballs typically resulted in the instant, untreatable, and horrific death of anyone unlucky enough to be standing in front of a cannon muzzle, the majority of Civil War surgical cases were from gunshot wounds caused by a .58-caliber minie ball – a soft metal, mostly hollow, incredibly heavy projectile over half an inch in diameter that was shaped very much like a modern bullet, and one that not only hit so hard that any bone it came in contact with shattered like a fluorescent lightbulb being smacked against a brick wall, but that also mushroomed on impact much like a modern-day hollow-point bullet, expanding to about an inch in width, ripping through muscle, blood vessels, organs, and all of those other important things that people keep inside their skin.

Because there was no such thing as organ transplantation, internal surgery, or blood transfusions, if a soldier got hit in the head, chest, or abdomen, he had a 90% chance of death – all you could do for the poor bastard was give him morphine and water and find a shady tree for him to sit under until he died.  Wounds to the arms and legs had better odds, however, which is why fully three-quarters of surgeries performed during the war were amputations performed on these appendages.

Here's how it worked.  After a guy got shot, he had 48 hours to get his arm cut off with an unsterilized hacksaw or he was probably going to die a painful death from gangrene.  You, as the doctor, working in terrible conditions at someone's kitchen counter, would slosh the blood off the operating table with a bucket, get the guy up there, then you'd have a couple minutes to figure out what kind of shape he was in.  If his arm wasn't broken, he might be ok – you can just wash it out, slap a tourniquet on there, and move on to the next guy.  If it was broken, you'd need to operate.  One of your nurses would anesthetize the dude with a chloroform-soaked rag (if it was available – in some field hospitals all you got was a shot of whiskey and a bullet to bite down on) until he was unconscious, then you'd have to stitch the broken artery closed with a needle and thread, dig the bullet out of there with your forceps, cut through the muscle with a sharp knife, saw through the bone with your hacksaw, tie off the arteries with another piece of thread, and then sew it all shut into a stump.

A good surgeon could perform the operation in under ten minutes.  And he'd do it dozens of times in a row, all of this while people were pounding the city with artillery shells and stray bullets were slamming into the walls around them.  One nurse at the Battle of Antietam recalled working on a guy in the hospital tent and then having a stray bullet pass through the tent, through the sleeve of her dress, and then kill him right in front of her, which, honestly may have been more of a humane way to go – because this was back before we knew you had to sterilize your equipment before you operated on a patient, almost 25% of people who underwent amputation surgery ended up dying from infected wounds.

Saving human lives by performing barbaric work with her bone saw under hellish conditions in the middle of a raging war zone as bullets and artillery shrapnel ripped through the skies around her, Mary Edwards Walker continued working as a front-line surgeon throughout the three-day Battle of Chattanooga.  After a heroic, unlikely charge by George Thomas's men broke the Confederate position and sent Bragg retreating back to Georgia, Walker continued her work, not only assisting wounded Federal troops but also crossing enemy lines and providing medical care to Confederate troops and civilians in Tennessee and Georgia.

On one of these trips to Georgia to aid sick and injured civilians, Walker was ambushed by Confederate pickets, who found her in her Union uniform carrying two pistols and arrested her as a spy, a detail that may or may not actually have been true (we can't prove it either way).  Her captors, who noted in their report that she argued "enough for a regiment of men", recommended sending her to a lunatic asylum for being a woman doctor, but instead she was sent to Richmond and thrown in a jail for Federal prisoners of war.  She spent four months in brutal conditions in the POW Camp, Walker was sent back to Yankee lines as part of a prisoner exchange (she later confessed that she was very proud to have been traded straight-up for a male Confederate surgeon).

After the war, Walker was sent back to the Union Army, where she was attached to Sherman's army during the Atlanta Campaign.  After the Battle of Atlanta, she was appointed Chief Surgeon at a women's military prison in Louisville, Kentucky, where she served until the end of the war.  After her service, Walker collected an Army pension, wrote a couple books, became a women's suffrage activist, founded a weird commune, and got arrested a couple times for wearing pants instead of a dress.

During her time in the Union Army, Dr. Mary Edwards Walker had been recommended for promotion both by General George Thomas and by General William Tecumseh Sherman.  Since she technically wasn't a uniformed service member, these requests for promotion could not be granted, but in honor of her service Mary Edwards Walker was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor in 1866.  Of the 1.8 million women who have served the United States military, she is the only one to ever receive the award.  The Federal government tried to correct this in 1917 when they changed the guidelines for the Medal of Honor, stipulating that it could only be awarded for actions that occurred in combat, and stripped 900 people – including Dr. Walker – of their awards.  Walker, obviously, told them to get bent – she wore the medal until her death in 1919.  It was officially reinstated by order of the President in 1977.

Sources:

Bollett, Alfred J.  "The Truth about Civil War Surgery."  Civil War Times.  June 12, 2006.

Davis, William.  Civil War Journal.  Thomas Nelson, 1999.

De Pauw, Linda Grant.  Battle Cries and Lullabies.  University of Oklahoma Press, 2000.

Schroeder, Glenna R.  The Encyclopedia of Civil War Medicine.  M.E. Sharpe, 2008.

Wilbur, C. Keith.  Civil War Medicine.  Globe Pequot, 1998.

From: military.com

Was Civil War Surgery Effective? (Abstract)

By Matthew Baker

Economics Working Paper Archive at Hunter College from Hunter College Department of Economics

Abstract:
During the U. S. Civil War (1861-65) surgeons performed a vast number of surgical procedures such as amputations, resections, excisions, and bullet extractions. The efficacy of wartime surgery has been the subject of continuing debate since the start of the war. One reason debate continues is the dearth of empirical evidence on the (in)effectiveness of surgery. To shed light on the subject, I analyze a data set created by Dr. Edmund Andrews, a Civil war surgeon with the 1st Illinois Light Artillery. Dr. Andrews’s data can be rendered into an observational data set on surgical intervention and recovery, with controls for wound location and severity. The data also admits instruments for the surgical decision. My analysis suggests that Civil War surgery was effective, and increased the probability of survival of the typical wounded soldier, with average treatment effect of 0.25-0.28.

Downloads: (external link)
http://econ.hunter.cuny.edu/wp-content/uploads/sit ... /HunterEconWP444.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

More papers in Economics Working Paper Archive at Hunter College from Hunter College Department of Economics 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065. Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Jonathan Conning (jconning@hunter.cuny.edu).

From: econpaprs.repec.org

Letter Showed Primitive Civil War Medicine

From: georgiainfo.galileo.usg.edu

November 03, 1862
A Georgia soldier in Virginia wrote home to his wife, telling her of being sick, and of the many Georgians who had died there; then added a note showing the primitive nature of Civil War medical treatment.

“…I have had some fever every day for four days. I think I will go to taking some medicine this Eavening…I have a very soar throat an bad cold. I have not got my strenghth back yet but it is improving. …I just got back from the soldiers grave yard I have been out and saw one Buried. there is more Georgia soldiers Burried there than any other state. I think there must be 4 or 5 hundred Georgians. when a soldier gets bad sick here they nearly all dy. The doctors cut off somebodys Leg, arm, hand, or foot or some other part nearly every day here. …” Source: Katherine S. Holland (ed.), Keep All My Letters: The Civil War Letters of Richard Henry Brooks, 51st Georgia Infantry (Macon: Mercer University Press, 2003), pp. 52-53.

The Garthright House Served as a Union Field Hospital at the Battle of Cold Harbor

By Mark, 10-28-16

At the time of the Civil War, Miles and Margaret Garthright lived in a two story home a few miles east of Richmond, Virginia. While the location near the city was no doubt convenient in peacetime, it was very much in harm’s way during the war, and was on the battlefield of two major battles during two campaigns.

The house was on the edge of the June 27th, 1862 Battle of Gaines Mill, one of the Seven Days Battles of the Peninsula Campaign on 1862. It was more in the middle of the action two years later during General Ulysses S. Grant’s Overland Campaign, specifically, during the Battle of Cold Harbor from the end of May into early June of 1864. Cold Harbor is probably most infamous for the ill advised Union assault against entrenched Confederate positions on June 3rd, when the Federals suffered over 6,000 total casualties. Units from both the 2nd and 6th Corps charged through the property during that fateful assault.

The Federals turned the building into a field hospital, forcing the Garthright family into the basement. As the historical marker on the site notes, blood from the wounded dripped through the floorboards and into the basement. Some 97 Union soldiers died there and were hastily buried in the Garthright’s yard. In 1866, the bodies were removed to the Cold Harbor National Cemetery across the road. After the Union army moved on from Cold Harbor, the Confederates also used the house as a hospital.

Portions of the Garthright House date to the 1700′s. The house was damaged by a fire in 1970 and was restored, and is a part of the Richmond National Battlefield Park. The house is an exterior exhibit only and the interior is not open to the public.

Image: Garthright House, Richmond National Battlefield Park

From: ironbrigader.com

Gangrene

From: humanillnesses.com

Gangrene (gang-GREEN) is a condition that leads to the death of living tissue. It is caused by blocked blood flow or by bacterial infection.

KEYWORDS
for searching the Internet and other reference sources

Arteriosclerosis

Bacterial infections

Debridement

Frostbite

Hyperbaric chamber

What Is Gangrene?
Gangrene is a condition in which living tissue (skin, muscle, or bone) dies and decays. Gangrene most often affects the legs, feet, arms, and fingers, but it also can affect internal organs such as the intestine or gallbladder. Gangrene can occur when blood flow to an area of the body is blocked or when certain types of bacteria * invade a wound.

* bacteria are round, spiral, or rod-shaped single-celled microorganisms without a distinct nucleus that commonly multiply by cell division. Some types may cause disease in humans, animals, or plants.

Dry gangrene
Dry gangrene can occur when blood flow to a part of the body is blocked. When tissues in the body are deprived of the nutrients and oxygen carried by blood, they begin to die. Dry gangrene

Military Medicine
U.S. Civil War (1861-1865)
The biggest killer in the U.S. Civil War was not instant death by bullet or by cannonball: it was disease resulting from wounds. An estimated 388,500 men died from wounds and other illnesses, including gangrene. Doctors with dirty hands unknowingly infected wounds with gangrene-causing bacteria while trying to treat the injured soldiers.

During this war, doctors noticed that the wounds of some of the soldiers were infested with maggots, which are the larvae of houseflies or blowflies. Those maggot-infested wounds tended to heal faster than those without maggots, because the maggots were eating the dead or decaying tissue that resulted from gangrene infection. Thus, the maggots were cleaning out the dead and decaying tissue, allowing the remaining tissue to heal. They were doing the work that surgeons do today to treat gangrene through debridement of wounds.

World War I (1914-1918)
During World War I, 15,000 miles of trenches stretched along the western front in Europe. Troops who spent many weeks in these cold, wet trenches often developed swollen limbs, damaged sensory nerves, and inflammation, a condition that they called "trench foot."

Trench foot often resulted in gangrene, loss of tissue, and sometimes in loss of limbs to amputations. Physicians and military officers responded to the problem by instituting strict standards of hygiene that became part of the military's ongoing preventive health regimen.

can result from injury or frostbite * , but it most commonly is a complication of diabetes. Diabetes can lead to hardening of the arteries (arteriosclerosis), which restricts blood flow. This is especially common in the legs and feet.

Dry gangrene usually starts in the toes. A person might first feel numbness or tingling in the feet. As gangrene progresses and tissue starts to die, the person will experience severe pain in the affected area. Eventually, the tissue turns black, marking where tissue has died. This type of gangrene needs to be treated promptly, but it is usually not life threatening.

Wet gangrene
Wet gangrene occurs when certain types of bacteria invade an injured area of the body. It occurs most often after an injury in which a body part was crushed or when blood flow was obstructed by a blood clot or a tight bandage. The lack of blood flow causes some cells to die and leak fluid, which moistens the surrounding tissue. The moist environment allows bacteria, such as Streptococci (strepto-KOK-sy) and Staphylococci (staf-i-lo-KOK-sy), to invade the wound and multiply. Wet gangrene causes swollen and blistered skin, and it has a foul odor. Once wet gangrene sets in, it spreads quickly to surrounding tissue. If left untreated, it can kill a person in a few days.

Gas gangrene
Gas gangrene is a type of wet gangrene that usually is caused by the bacterium called Clostridium (klo-STRID-e-um). This type of bacteria requires very little oxygen to live, and it releases gases and toxins as waste products. Gas gangrene causes a high fever, brown pus * , and gas bubbles on the skin.

How Is Gangrene Treated?
When a person has diabetes, frostbite, or an injury, preventing gangrene is a high priority. Taking medications, maintaining good blood circulation, avoiding foot injuries, and not smoking are essential for preventing dry gangrene in people with diabetes. Prompt cleaning of wounds to avoid bacterial infection can prevent wet gangrene.

* frostbite is damage to tissues as the result of exposure to low environmental temperatures. It is also called congelation (kon-je-LAY-shun).

* pus is a thick, creamy fluid, usually yellow or greenish in color, that forms at the site of an infection.

* amputation (am-pu-TAY-shun) is the removal of a limb or other appendage or outgrowth of the body.

* antibiotics (an-ti-bi-OT-iks) are drugs that kill or slow the growth of bacteria.

See also
Bacterial Infections
Cold-related Injuries
Diabetes

If a person develops gangrene, dead tissue needs to be surgically removed before healing can begin (a process called debridement). Doctors try to improve circulation to the affected part of the body and surgeons remove dead tissue. Because bacterial forms of gangrene can spread quickly, part or all of the affected limb might require amputation. * People with wet gangrene also are treated with antibiotics. * Sometimes, people with gangrene are treated in a hyperbaric chamber. This procedure exposes the body to oxygen at high pressure, which promotes healing of the gangrenous tissue.

Image: Amputation saws for treating gangrene infections were part of the military doctor's field equipment.

Civil War Medicine and the RCH

From: rochesterregional.org

The American Civil War is considered one of the most defining periods in American history. The war touched the lives of every American and influenced the early history of the Rochester City Hospital. The magnitude of combat casualties prompted the creation of the Army Medical Corps. The efficient organization of hospitals coupled with medical advancements such as camp sanitation, improved methods of transportation, and hospital design helped to decrease mortality rates and left a lasting effect on medical science for decades. Additionally, the Civil War became the training ground for many surgeons who would later become respected members of Rochester City Hospital’s medical staff.

Rochester City Hospital opened in February 1864 and from the beginning admitted furloughed soldiers as patients. Although only St. Mary’s Hospital was designated as a U.S. Army General Hospital, both St. Mary’s and Rochester City Hospital treated local wounded union soldiers. Federal funding of $5.50 per week compensated the hospitals for treating wounded soldiers and in 1865, this revenue accounted for seventy-five percent of the City Hospital’s income.1

Army Medical Corps
By the end of the war, the U.S. Army had developed a well-organized medical corps comprising a system of levels of treatment starting at Regimental Dressing Stations where minor wounds were treated and triage was performed before transfer to Division hospitals. Depending on the severity of the wounds, patients were transferred to Division and Corps Hospitals for surgery or treatment for disease. Casualties requiring extended treatment were evacuated to theater based Army Depot Evacuation Hospitals or to larger Army General Hospitals. To make room for new casualties, many patients were furloughed back to their homes for recuperation or prolonged treatment in civilian General hospitals such as St. Mary’s and the Rochester City hospital. The great majority of Civil War deaths were the result of disease rather than combat wounds.

Threat from Disease
In the Civil War, Army surgeons treated a wide spectrum of illness as well as performed advanced surgical procedures. Of the 618,000 reported deaths from both the Federal and Confederate forces during the four years of war, 414,000 were the result of disease. Poor diet, lack of proper clothing, and equipment, and unsanitary conditions contributed greatly to the deaths from disease. Acute and chronic dysentery were referred to as fluxes and eruptive fevers were the diseases of small pox, measles and scarlet fever. Gangrene is not mentioned in the official records because at the time it was not considered a disease but the result of an operation. It is now known that gangrene is a result of a unique organism and qualifies as a disease.

Surgeons attempted to treat these conditions with a variety of compounds and treatments. Usually the most effective medicine was a good diet and the body’s natural restorative ability. The medical thought of the time believed that the blood carried disease and by purging the “ill-humors” in the blood, health could be restored. It would not be until the Second World War and the advent of antibiotics (primarily penicillin) that a real understanding and effective treatment of disease would be realized.

The most common surgical procedure performed by Army surgeons was amputation. The advancement of military weaponry far outpaced the advancement of medicine. The development and use of the .58 caliber Minié Ball bullet and the relatively low muzzle velocity of the percussion musket all but guaranteed the shattering of bones that left no alternative treatment but amputation. Although ether was used at times, chloroform was the most common form of anesthetic. A typical army surgical team would consist of one surgeon to perform the operation, two assistant surgeons to hold the patient on both sides and one assistant surgeon or medical assistant to hold the limb to be removed. It is estimated that after a major battle, each team would perform an amputation every 15 minutes and often, surgeons would remain on their feet engaged in surgeries for up to 48 hours at one stretch.

Rochester City Hospital's Army Surgeons
Service in the Army offered a unique opportunity for physicians to gain practical and clinical experience without the challenges associated with private practice. Several early members of the City Hospital’s medical staff served as Army surgeons and would later have significant influence on the hospital success and growth.

Doctor David Little began his medical practice in Rochester in 1859. Weeks after the guns of Fort Sumter sparked the beginning of the war, Little was mustered into the Army with the 13th N.Y. Volunteer Infantry in May 1861. He served for the next two years before being discharged in May 1863. Dr. Little returned to Rochester to resume his medical practice and was appointed as a visiting Physician to the staff of the City Hospital in October 1866. He later served as President of the Medical Staff from 1886 until 1898.

Immediately after his graduation from the Albany Medical College, Dr. Enoch Vine Stoddard enlisted as the Assistant Surgeon in the 65th N.Y. Volunteer Infantry in June of 1863. He served with the regiment at the battle of Gettysburg and through General Grant’s Virginia Campaign. After his discharge in September 1864, He returned home to resume his medical practice and later moved to Rochester in 1871. Dr. Stoddard was elected later that year as an attending physician at the Rochester City Hospital and served as Secretary of the Medical Staff from 1872 until 1898. In association with Doctors Whitbeck and Ely, Stoddard was responsible for the funding and construction of the Doctor’s Pavilion for Contagious Diseases at the hospital. One of his later distinctions was as founder of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

Dr. William S. Ely was a second generation physician at the Rochester City Hospital. His father, William W. Ely, MD, was an early leader at Rochester City Hospital. After graduating from the University of Rochester in 1857, William S. Ely began the study of medicine in his father’s office. In August 1862 he enlisted in the 108th N.Y. Volunteer Infantry receiving his commission the following month as a regiment’s Assistant Surgeon. He was later transferred to Annapolis, Maryland where he served as an Army hospital administrator for the remainder of the war.

After three years of service, he was discharged in October 1865. Returning to civilian life, Dr. Ely enrolled in the College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York City, eventually graduating two years later. He received an appointment to the medical staff of the City Hospital in 1868 and for the next forty years his work at the city hospital would be instrumental in establishing the first School of Nursing, the Out-patient Department, and the Magne-Jewell memorial building. His career at the hospital and in the community also encompassed service as a private and ward physician and adviser to the managing Boards, hospital officers, colleagues, and as the first Vice-President of the Board of trustees of the University of Rochester.

Another member of the City Hospital’s staff to serve in the Civil War was Doctor Charles E. Rider. He received his medical degree from the University of Vermont in 1863 and a year later relocated to Rochester to establish his medical practice. Dr. Rider accepted the position as the City Hospital’s first Resident Physician in 1864 and later that year received appointed as Assistant Surgeon of the 54th Regiment of the N.Y. National Guard. The unit was activated for 90 days in July 1864 serving as prison guards in Elmira, N.Y. Returning to the City Hospital in November, Dr. Rider later developed the hospital’s first specialty clinic, the Department of Eye and Ear Disease. His work with the hospital laid the foundation for the hospital’s Out-Patient department where free medical treatment was dispensed. Dr. Rider remained active with the hospital until his death in 1909.

The American Civil War influenced the advancement of medical science by the shear magnitude of battle casualties. The lessons learned by the battle tested physicians and hospital administrators would later play a major part in the success and development of the early Rochester City Hospital.

Notes:
1. Teresa K. Lehr and Philip G. Maples, To Serve the Community: A Celebration of Rochester General Hospital 1847-1997 (Virginia Beach: Donning Publishing, 1997), 25-26

Credits: Text, and Layout:
Robert Dickson

Research:
Robert Dickson, Philip G. Maples and Wayne Mabb

Special Thanks to:
Philip G. Maples and Kathleen E. Britton for research assistance and editorial comment.

Sources:
Adams, George Worthington. Doctors in blue: The Medical History of the Union Army in the Civil War. Dayton: Morningside Press, 1985.
Coco, Gregory A. A Vast Sea of Misery: A History and Guide to the Union and Confederate Field Hospitals at Gettysburg, July 1- November 20, 1863. Gettysburg, Pa.: Thomas Publishing, 1988.
Dammann, Gordon. Pictorial Encyclopedia of Civil War Medical Instruments and Equipment. Missoula, Montana: Pictorial Histories Publishing, 1983.
McNamara, Robert F. St. Mary’s Hospital and the Civil War. Rochester: St. Mary’s Hospital,1961.
Naythons, Matthew , Sherwin B. Nuland, Stanley B. Burns. The Face of Mercy: A Photographic History of Medicine at War. New York: Random House, 1993.
Rochester In the Civil War, Blake McKelvey, ed. Rochester: Rochester Historical Society Publications XXII, 1944.
Rochester City Hospital Collection, Baker-Cederberg Museum and Archives. Viahealth Archives Consortium, Rochester, N.Y.

Thursday, January 26, 2017

Soldiers’ Dreams with Jonathan White

By Ashley Whitehead Luskey, 1-18-17

Over the course of this year, we’ll be interviewing some of the speakers from the upcoming 2017 CWI conference about their talks. Today we are speaking with Dr. Jonathan White, Associate Professor of American Studies and the Senior Fellow at the Center for American Studies at Christopher University.  His research interests focus on the U.S. Constitution, the American Civil War, and treason in American history.  He has authored, co-authored, and co-edited numerous books and articles for both scholarly journals and popular magazines.  His most recent works include "Emancipation, the Union Army, and the Reelection of Abraham Lincoln" (LSU Press, 2014, winner of the 2015 Abraham Lincoln Book Prize, and finalist for both the 2014 Jefferson Davis Prize and the 2015 Gilder Lehrman Lincoln Prize); “Our Little Monitor”: The Greatest Invention of the Civil War (co-authored with Anna Gibson Holloway, forthcoming, 2017); and "Midnight in America: Darkness, Sleep and Dreams during the Civil War" (forthcoming, 2017).  He is currently at work on a new book project entitled "Abraham Lincoln and the Slave Trade".

CWI:  What did dreams mean to Civil War-era Americans?  What did their dreams reveal about their experiences during the war?

WHITE:  Many Americans who lived through the Civil War were captivated by their dream lives.  They recorded them in letters and diaries.  Some even recalled them years later in memoirs and regimental histories.  They wrote them down, I think, because they recognized that their dreams revealed something about who they were and how they experienced this tumultuous period.  Some believed that their dreams were signs from God.  For that reason they could find comfort in them–even when they were dreams that portended death or other harm.

CWI:  How did dreams either help or haunt Americans during the Civil War? How did dreaming change, or remain the same, in the immediate wake of the war?

WHITE: Soldiers in both armies found comfort in their dreams.  We tend to assume that most soldiers suffered from traumatizing nightmares during the war.  To be sure, many had such dreams–and they wrote plenty about them.  But most soldiers’ dreams appear to have been pleasant.  They became an escape from the harsh realities of soldier-life, and a respite from heavy marching and fighting.  One of the most interesting things I found is that in the immediate wake of the war some soldiers found comfort in their dreams of war—reliving moments they had experienced on the battlefield—not in fearful ways, but with a sense of longing to return to their comrades.

CWI:  What are some of the major similarities or differences between Union and Confederate “dreamers” and the ways in which dreams were interpreted or viewed in the North and the South?

WHITE:  ‪Northern and Southern soldiers tended to have similar dreams.  Most often they dreamt of home, of loved ones, and of things that were familiar to them (like food).  These dreams helped encourage them during periods of long separation.  In a very real way, soldiers’ dreams of home were like visitations with loved ones, reminding men of what and who they were fighting for.

‪Northern and Southern women, by contrast, had very different types of dreams.  Of course, wives in both sections had terrible nightmares of their husbands being killed in battle.  But Northern and Southern women’s dreams were different in one fundamental way.  Southern civilians often dreamt of Yankee invasions, while Northern women often dreamt themselves going to battle.  Both could be terrifying in their own way, but each reflected the different experiences of civilians in the different sections.

Image 1: Currier & Ives,“The Soldier’s Dream of Home,” 1862, in Harper’s Weekly. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress.

Image 2: “The Soldier’s Dream,” in Harper’s Weekly, November 7, 1863. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress.

From: gettysburgcompiler.com

The Day Lincoln Died: The Final Premonition

By Christopher Coleman

As every school child knows (or should know) Abraham Lincoln, our sixteenth President, was assassinated on April 14, 1865, and died in the early morning hours of the following day, April 15.  Less well known is that, that very morning, Lincoln revealed to his cabinet a premonition—a presentiment some would call it—of his very own death.

The incident has been a favorite anecdote of Lincoln biographers for generations, although academic historians have tended to dismiss or ignore it.  In researching The Paranormal Presidency, however, I went back to the primary sources, to people who worked with Lincoln or were his friends, to verify the story. Often times an anecdote, especially one about Lincoln, makes for a good story and is repeated over and over, yet has not any basis in fact. At first glance, this premonition of Lincoln’s might seem to fit that category.

While I give Lincoln’s final premonition in full in Chapter 17 of the Paranormal Presidency of Abraham Lincoln, a brief synopsis is that, during a cabinet meeting the morning of April 14, while waiting for the meeting to begin in earnest, Lincoln related a strange dream he had had the night before. It was about a ship sailing to an indefinite shore. What was peculiar about the dream was that he told his cabinet (and General Grant) that he had had this very same dream before every major event of the war. As Lincoln was hourly expecting news from the Carolinas from Sherman, that the last major Confederate army had surrendered, Lincoln assumed it would be good news from that front.

Doubtless at the time of the meeting, it was regarded as yet another of Lincoln’s little anecdotes that his cabinet had to suffer through.  It was only after he was assassinated that night that everyone present realized that Lincoln had actually foretold his own death.

As noted above, this incident has been told and retold by many folks over the years. Charles Dickens gave a dramatic version of the story, obviously with added Dickensian touches; Lincoln’s close friend and sometime bodyguard, Ward Hill Lamon, likewise ornamented the story a bit. Moreover, as time went on, many writers elaborated on it. So, for the professional debunkers out there, it has been easy to dismiss the story as fiction, something invented long after the fact.

The trouble with professional cynics is that starting from a priori assumptions, they rarely look at the facts objectively; more often than not, they skip over primary sources that are inconvenient to their thesis. Some skepticism is a healthy thing: cynicism in not; neither is shoddy scholarship.

In fact, there were at least two men present during the Cabinet meeting in question who reported Lincoln’s prophetic dream.  There are slight variations in quoting Lincoln’s exact words, as there are with Lamon’s account; but anyone who has dealt extensively with eyewitness accounts of an event knows that is to be expected.

Moreover, within days of his death, news of the incident had spread far and wide. When Lincoln’s body was being returned by train to Springfield, Illinois stopped in Philadelphia, on April 22, his body put on display for mourners to view. Among the many memorial wreaths beside the body was one which stood out. It had a banner emblazoned across it which read:

“Before every great national event I
have always had the same dream.
I had it the other night. It is of a
ship sailing rapidly….”

The crowd in Philadelphia that April 22, needed no explanation; word of Lincoln’s last prophetic dream had already become common knowledge. It is not prima facie evidence, true; but is proof that the story was no later invention.

Lincoln’s last premonition is thus a historic fact. If one chooses to dismiss it as mere coincidence, that is always a convenient out for inconvenient truths and people are free to believe what they want. But it did happen.

Walt Whitman, who was in Washington during the war years, was so inspired by Lincoln’s prophetic dream that he turned it into one of his most famous poems, O Captain! My Captain! When I was a boy, in fact, we were required to memorize it, along with other famous pieces of American poetry. I doubt they do that any more; and I doubt that many folks who are familiar with the poem really know the true background behind it.

Clearly, Lincoln dreamed of his ship approaching that “indefinite shore,” and while soon after, “The ship is anchor’d safe and sound, its voyage closed and done,”
Lincoln, its captain, did not live to see the ship of state safe in port.

For more on this last, best documented, of Lincoln’s premonitions, as well as the full text of Walt Whitman’s “O Captain! My Captain!” read The Paranormal Presidency of Abraham Lincoln.  Oh yes, and be sure to memorize the poem for class next Monday.  Class dismissed.

About Christopher Coleman
I am an author, lecturer, and sometime instructor. My interests span a variety of subjects, including Southern tales of the supernatural, American history and folklore, military history in general, as well as archaeology, anthropology, plus various and sundry things that go bump in the night. I currently have five books in print: Strange Tales of the Dark and Bloody Ground, Ghosts and Haunts of the Civil War, Dixie Spirits and Ghosts and Haunts of Tennessee. My latest is The Paranormal Presidency of Abraham Lincoln, a documenary history of some more esoteric aspects the sixteenth President. My next book will also be a Civil War tome dealing with famous author Ambrose Bierce's military experiences in the Late Unpleasantness, due for release soon.

From: thelateunpleasantness.wordpress.com

Follow us on Twitter @CivilWarRx

Share

Facebook Twitter Delicious Stumbleupon Favorites